Which statement best describes the duty to intervene?

• A. Failure to intervene in a situation of potential harm.
• B. Duty to intervene is unrelated to first aid.
• C. Duty to intervene means only to report.
• D. Duty to intervene means to do nothing.

Answer: (A)

The duty to intervene means you must act when you recognize a situation where someone could be harmed. In a correctional setting, that includes stepping in to stop violence, providing or securing medical aid, and preventing further harm whenever it’s safe to do so. Not acting—failing to intervene—shows a breach of that obligation and exposes you and the institution to liability. So the statement describing failure to intervene in a situation of potential harm best captures what the duty requires: it emphasizes that allowing harm to continue is not acceptable. The other ideas miss the duty by implying you only report, or by suggesting inaction or a lack of relation to first aid, which isn’t consistent with the obligation to act to prevent harm.